I recently read a New York Times article, which addressed
the growing issue with U.S companies and total energy consumption. The booming
industry with all-online companies are the ones who are running their companies
on thousands of square feet of computers and servers. James Glanz discloses
that “Google’s data centers consume nearly 300 million watts and Facebook’s
about 60 million watts.” Worldwide the number is even scarier among digital
warehouses which produce over 30 billion watts of electricity a year, “roughly
the equivalent to the output of 30 nuclear power plants.” Not only are these
companies using billions of watts of electricity each year to support their
companies, but the amount of this energy that goes to waste is staggering.
Empirics from The Times show that data centers around the country can waste 90
percent or more of the electricity they pull of the grid. The article explains
this because companies “typically run their facilities at maximum capacity
around the clock, whatever the demand.”
There is also a environmental cost brought by the wasteful
usage of electricity by our nation’s most successful companies and enterprises.
These companies break several environmental regulations due to their over-usage
of diesel powered generators. Amazon in particular was cited with 24
violations, as resported by Virginia’s Department of Enviornmental Quality. The
VDEQ slapped Amazon with a fine of $554,476 for “for installing and repeatedly
running diesel generators without obtaining standard environmental permits
required to operate in Virginia.”
I find it extremely troubling that these “paperless” and
“green” companies who function solely on the Worldwide Web are the ones who are
producing serious toxins due to the running of their computer generators. The
worst of it, is that there is no solvency. Programs are brought up by companies
for lower input of electricity, but they will ALWAYS need excessive amounts of
electricity to run this footloose industry. After negotiations Amazon only had
to pay $261,638 of the fine (New York Times) a mere parking ticket for this
multi-billion consuming conglomerate. I hope these companies too can find a way
to drastically reduce their carbon footprint. Please feel free to comment below
with your thoughts on reducing environmental harms and what we can do to help
even slightly. You would be surprised on how the slightest contributions can
make a big difference. For further references to this article, I urge you to
read it here
Cited: New York Times
I think it is really interesting that even though a company doesnt use a lot of paper, it can still be detrimental to the environment. In school, I thought of the new ipads as environmentally friendly, because they reduce the amount of paper used in classrooms, it never occurred to me that the ipads are also hurting the environment because of the amount of energy they consume. It seems that whether we use paper ("old fashioned methods")or ipads, computers,and other modern devices, we are still harming the environment.
ReplyDelete